A best-selling author and highly acclaimed artist, Chris loves to touch hearts with hope and love. Jo-Ann A.
- Series by cover.
- On Democracy.
- QuickTime for Filmmakers (Quicktime Developer Series).
- Earliest English Kings.
- Ancient Fiction – The Matrix of Early Christian and Jewish Narrative | brill.
- Rainbow of Computer Science: Dedicated to Hermann Maurer on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday.
- Ancient Fiction: The Matrix of Early Christian And Jewish Narrative (Symposium Series).
Brant , Charles W. Hedrick , Chris Shea. The essays in this volume examine the relationship between ancient fiction in the Greco-Roman world and early Jewish and Christian narratives. They consider how those narratives imitated or exploited conventions of fiction to produce forms of literature that expressed new ideas or shaped community identity within the shifting social and political climates of their own societies. This diverse collection reveals and examines prevalent issues and syntheses in the making: the pervasive use and subversive power of imitation, the distinction between fiction and history, and the use of history in the expression of identity.
The contributors are Jo-Ann A.
Brant, J. Hock, Tawny L. Certain variants can perhaps be traced back to changes made by Chaucer himself, but there are few explicit exter- nal links between the fragments; see Benson, Riverside Chaucer, 5. In Daniel, however, the prologue is not the kind in which an author states his or her intentions, nor does it introduce an explicit storyteller or storytellers, i. For instance, in Dan 5 King Belshazzar is told of Daniel by his mother, who recounts events from the story in Dan 4, but in Dan 2 King Nebuchadnez- zar meets Daniel for the first time as if the events of Dan 1 never took place.
This stresses the discrete and self-contained nature of the stories as opposed to a novelistic or linear development of plot running through Dan 1—6. On the other hand, when one considers the addition of the visions Dan 7—12 to the stories, the situation becomes nuanced. In , the third- person stories about Daniel switch to the first-person visions of Daniel: the Daniel of the stories speaks. But here, the Greek versions of Daniel subvert the visions because of their ordering—in both Theodotion and the Old Greek OG , the book of Daniel does not end with the visions of Dan 7—12, but with an addi- tional story or stories that are again told in the third person.
In the case of Theodotion Daniel, the book is ordered almost as a vita, since it book-ends its version of the entire Masoretic Text MT of Daniel chs. As Lawrence Wills has noted, the kings were imposed on the stories which originally lacked them , in order to follow the cycle of kingdoms in the oracle of ch.
See Lawrence M. This is in contrast to the MT, Theodotion, and the two other OG manuscripts, which order the stories separately from the visions, resulting in the fact that the story of ch. The Greek versions Old Greek and Theodotion belong to the other text type containing the long edition of the book of Daniel—the additions in Dan 3, plus the appended Daniel stories, Susanna and Bel and the Dragon. Scholars have traditionally confronted this problem of the divergent texts of Daniel with attempts to ascertain the authority or priority of a particular text or its presumably Semitic Vorlage.
This strategy of searching for the Urtext, the authoritative and origi- nal text, has until recent years been considered by scholars to be the central task in any attempt at critically establishing biblical texts. The assumption was that the history of a text can be diagrammed as a sort of genealogical tree possessing a trunk from which all textual groups branch.
Recently, however, scholars such as Eugene Ulrich, Emanuel Tov, and Bertil Albrektson, to name only a few, have demonstrated the simplicity of this view and have begun outlining the multidimensional aspects of textual composition and development. However, the concern for chronology in Pap. See, e. Harrelson ed. James L. Crenshaw; Macon, Ga. These editions likely existed alongside each other from earliest times and did not develop from each other.
Dean Wenthe has utilized these considerations in his careful assess- ment of the character of the OG in Dan 1—6. One of his conclusions is that the OG is consistent throughout the book of Daniel, even in most portions of Dan 4—6. The MT displays similar pluses to those in the OG. Therefore, one cannot regard either of the textual traditions of these chap- ters as superior to the other. Story- collections do indeed often contain stories that possess multiple editions Dean O.
These conclusions are similar to those of Sharon Pace Jeansonne for Dan 7— There is no need to posit one Semitic original or Urtext from which all versions of the Daniel stories descended. As Bludau noted long ago, it is dif- ficult to tell the difference between Semitizing Greek and a translation of a Semitic Vorlage.
The tree grew great and strong; its height reached to heaven, and the sight of it ht'wOzxj to the end of all the earth. Its foliage was beautiful, its fruit abundant, and food for all was in it. Beneath it the beasts of the field found shade; the birds of the sky lived in its branches. From it all flesh was fed. Its appearance o3rasij was great and there was not another like it.ps-fe-api.gsenergy.io/applications-and-theory-of-petri-nets-1.php
Ancient Fiction: The Matrix of Early Christian and Jewish Narrative (Sbl - Symposium)
Its branches were about thirty stadia long; all the wild beasts of the earth found shade under it, See also John J. Translations of MT b—9 and OG b—12 are my own. Its food was plentiful and good and it supported all living things. Its appearance was great. Its crown came close to heaven and its trunk to the clouds, filling the region under heaven. The sun and the moon dwelt in it and it illumined the whole earth.
The details added by the OG are employed to amplify our wonder at this marvelous tree, and to reinforce the cosmic imagery behind the story. This tree is so great that no other tree has ever been like it, its branches are approximately thirty stadia long about five miles , and it takes up so much space in both heaven and earth that the sun and the moon are said to live in its branches. And the fact that no scholar can produce a Vorlage or Urtext for this passage may be due, not to the fact that it was lost some- time in the past, but to the fact that there never was one.
In regard to the book of Daniel, textual lower criticism and historical higher criticism go hand in hand, especially when one remembers that the Hebrew- Aramaic Daniel of B. To illustrate this, not only do we have the additional stories of Susanna and Bel and the Dragon as well as the Prayer and Song inserted into Dan 3 found in the Greek additions, but also other Daniel stories and visions in parabiblical manuscripts from Qumran in Ara- maic perhaps up to seven compositions in nine manuscripts ,31 as well The Prayer of Nabonidus 4Q does not mention Daniel by name, but refers to a Jewish diviner rzg who has a hand in healing the Babylonian king Nabonidus Nbny or Nabunay of a disease after seven years of affliction.
The two Pseudo-Daniel compositions 4Q— and 4Q both mention a certain Daniel and seem to review history in some way, although they probably were influenced by the biblical Daniel rather than the other way round. For example, the Four Kingdoms com- position contains an unnamed seer who tells of his vision of an angel and four speaking trees that symbolize four kingdoms, and 4Q mentions a judge in a court setting.
Dan 7. While the identity of the figure is unclear in this fragmentary text, it seems that someone utters the information about him in the presence of a Gentile king. Josephus relates that Daniel was responsible for the building of a burial tower in Ecbatana in Media. He adds that in his day the kings of Media, Persia, and Parthia were still being buried in the tower, and that a Jewish priest was entrusted with the care of it. Maurice Carrez et al.
Ancient Fiction : The Matrix of Early Christian and Jewish Narrative - Details - Trove
But now George W. This material in both languages, as well as the existence of the Papyrus Amherst 63, a twenty-two-column Aramaic text in Demotic Most scholars agree that the righteous judge Dn il in the Ugaritic story of Aqhat from the mid-second millennium B. Neither the Ezekiel author nor the Daniel author probably knew directly of the Ugaritic story. However, note that the inclusion of Daniel beside Noah and Job as righteous worthies in Ezek hints that Daniel was thought to be an ancient non-Jewish character of legendary fame, like the other two.
Wills, Jew in the Court of the Foreign King, 39— Her- bert Franke et al. Wills suggests that this story of an Egyptian courtier only occurred in Egypt because of Persian influence Jew in the Court of the Foreign King, The lector-priest, known for reading incantations, was understood to be a magician; see, for instance, Robert K.
Browse rare books
Although the text is only partially preserved, its editor, Kim Ryholt, believes it to be similar in many respects to the Arabian Nights. One also notes stories and story-cycles surrounding various other Egyptian courtiers from the first centuries B. The papyrus contains several compositions from various genres. See Sven P. Vleem- ing and Jan W.
The main texts are in Demotic and Greek from the second and third century C. The Aramaic text was first published by Arthur E. The papyri were rearranged and retranslated by Porten and Yardeni, Textbook of Aramaic Documents, — This new material shares similar motifs and morphology with the Jewish Hebrew and Aramaic Daniel stories: 1 Concerning genre, the Egyptian magician stories are often court tales wherein a wise courtier succeeds over his rivals at court or triumphs over an ordeal. Finally, some of the same characters show up across many different texts, forming interwoven story-cycles gravitating around those figures.
Daniel 1—6, the collection of stories about the Jewish Daniel and his friends, exhibits these generic features, as does the book of Daniel as a whole to some extent. In addition, the fact that there is a large pool of extrabiblical material about Daniel, hints at the popularity of this figure to Hellenistic Jews. Egyptian magicians vie with each other in their attempts to out-perform each other and thereby win the favor of the king, but it is the exceptionally skilled and wise magician who is marked to succeed over the others.
They are able to read sealed documents e. In Dan 4, Daniel is on hand when Nebuchadnezzar regains his senses, while in 4Q Prayer of Nabonidus , the possible source for the Dan 4 story, the Jewish diviner apparently intercedes with God to cure the king of his disease. For instance, it is notable that the Papyrus West- car uses the story-collection device to launch some ex eventu predictions about the coming of the Fifth Dynasty.
Certainly Papyrus Westcar is much older than Daniel, but it should be noted that its themes of magicians and others who predict the future survive, or rather flourish, in the later liter- ature that is closer to or contemporary with the Daniel stories. The Dan 3, Onchsheshonqy, Papyrus Vandier. Suffice to say that it now seems possible to posit a greater connection between the book of Daniel and Egyptian literature than usually thought.
On the reverse of the papyrus, further disasters are enumerated. However, the connections made are with Egyptian prophetic texts in which a sage predicts the future before a king, but not with Egyptian court tales other than the Papyrus Westcar. There seems, thus, to be an even larger Near Eastern tradition of court tales than previously thought, especially in Aramaic and Egyptian litera- ture from Egypt.
To view Daniel in the light of the story-collection genre, sheds new light on our understanding: it brings new literary parallels to our attention, and new evidence some previously little-known Egyptian courtier stories , to bear on questions of textual criticism, composition, and literary traditions and processes.